cricket journalism


Did anyone else notice that England were playing test cricket? It kind of by-passed me somewhat. Haven’t we just played Bangladesh? Didn’t we wallop them this time last year?

With all due respect to Jonathan Trott, The cricket can tumble on. I just flicked on Sky Sports to be confronted by its regular piece on various club teams from around the UK. I caught Workington and St Helens before turning off because, almost instinctively, I don’t like them.

It’s not that they are necessarily bad or unpleasant teams. They may be a cracking bunch of lads. It’s just that I’ve grown to instinctively dislike the opposition. I’ll pick out the fancy dans, the sloggers and the ‘all the gear’ types. Somehow I know that there will be some dreadful chat, shouts of ‘great shot Rich’ to nicks between keeper and slips and that the late-teen to mid-20s players will all be horrendously spoiled little buggers that are rude to their mothers despite getting their whites cleaned for them by those too scared to stop pandering to their little darlings.

I also know that them being on Sky Sports regularly will cause egos to inflate to the point that even the small and friendly sides will catch ‘big club syndrome’, and that the big clubs will be even more unbearable than they were before.

I also – instinctively – know that a half decent side that I am part of would wipe the floor with all of them put together and see them off with a caustic, inspired and intelligent chirp.

I may also be slightly bitter that my team hasn’t been picked. Bastards.

Sorry, but I’m feeling old today ;-)

So, there is a very real possibility that Craig Kieswetter (born in Johannesburg, South Africa) will make his England debut in one day international against Bangladesh tomorrow. Fair play to the lad, he is English qualified, holds a British passport and, most importantly, has earned his place on merit.

I don’t go in for all this moaning about the amount of players born abroad in the England side. We’re a nation that has for thousands of years had been built on immigration. I just so happened to be of Anglo Saxon stock, with a bit of Irish mixed in, and believe me you don’t want me playing in the England team!

The England cricket team has a proud history of including foreign born players who are qualified to play, yet it has depended on the prevailing public opinion of the time whether anyone has chosen to criticise this. I’m not sure anyone sensible ever does.

When there was almost an international incident over England’s selection of Basil D’Oliveira (Cape Town, South Afica) for a tour of South Africa, I’m not sure they were too many people on this island that suggested it was inappropriate for him to play for us.

Likewise, the likes of Allan Lamb (Cape Province, South Africa), Robin Smith (Durban, South Africa) and Graeme Hick (Salisbury, Zimbabwe) were judged according to temperament and ability, rather than their southern African upbringings. Players of West Indian heritage were also more than welcome, Devon Malcolm (Kingston, Jamaica) was seen as the great hope for fighting the fire of the West Indies pace attack with some fire his own variety. Gladstone Small (St. George, Barbados) and Phillip DeFreitas (Scotts Head, Dominica) both had respectable England careers, which included an Ashes win in Australia. Today they would have MBEs. Oh, and of course there was Nasser Hussain (Madras, India).

There was of course the controversial article included in a 1995 issue of Wisden magazine, which questioned the commitment of foreign born cricketers born of immigrant parents. I remember this causing quite a stir at Derbyshire, then the home county of both Malcolm and DeFreitas, and it took quite a while for the tag of racism attributed to the publication that held the same venerable name as cricket’s yellow bible to be lifted.

So, why is there such a stir today? Granted there are a few England players born in South Africa. Kevin Pieterson (Pietermaritzburg, Natal, South Africa) and Jonathan Trott (Cape Town, South Africa) both took the decision to progress the cricket careers in England, and pinned their colours to the mast early on. Not for them the slightly dubious practice of playing county cricket as a British player, but being unsure as to which country to represent until one of them came calling. Andrew Strauss (Johannesburg, South Africa) has an English mother and move to England at six, while Matt Prior (Johannesburg, South Africa) has an English father and has been here since aged 11. I’m not sure there was ever any doubt about which international side they would both wish to play for.

That there are so many South African born players at this point in time is a bit of a quirk, but if they are the best English qualified players, then I really don’t have a problem. We’ve been including cricketers born overseas for years, but that more reflects the multi-cultural nature of the UK, rather than a cynical attempt to pinch the talent.

If anything, I’d suggest that the media have been trying to whip up a bit of a storm to see if they could get some of the colourful comments that create some of the easy stories of the type they got when KP first played for England.

Kieswetter did the interview bit in the week stressing his dual heritage, which was a bit unnecessary for me, but didn’t feed the media machine by knocking the Saffas. Hopefully, the focus from tomorrow will be on the way he bats. Should he be able to step up to international level he will bring a bit of sparkle to the English top order.

Not sure how I missed it, but the Tesco shopping pledge got me a mention in Patrick Kidd’s column in The Times. I am, as ever, deeply honoured. Oh, yes, Terry Leahy, I know you read this, I spent £90.67 on Saturday in the Chesterfield branch.

Every now and again The Village Cricketer is sent material for consideration to include on the post. Sometimes its complete crap, so we don’t include it, on other occasions its worth using. A corporate giant has coughed up for this one, hiring pro cricket writer Philip Oliver, yes that Philip Oliver, to spread the word. His opinions are not necessarily shared by me, but in the spirit of fair play and all that I’ll give you some perspective. Enjoy…

Much ink has been spilled over England’s decision to rest Andrew Strauss from their tour of Bangladesh.

Many suggest that the England captain should lead his team at every opportunity, but the real problem with Strauss’ exclusion is not the moral implications of an absent leader, but the fact it could leave England exposed.

The squad will depart for Bangladesh not only without its captain, but also without its best strike bowler as James Anderson is also being given a rest. None touring squad have played international cricket in Bangladesh before, so the absence of key players could be significant.

Even though the cricket betting makes England strong favourites, Bangladesh should not be taken lightly. Despite their recent Test series defeat by India they are an improving team whose 2-0 win in West Indies last year should not be written off as a victory against weakened opposition.

They have a genuine Test all-rounder in new skipper Shakib Al-Hasan and he is capable of turning matches with both bat and ball. His slow left arm bowling will play an important role in the series.

Fellow spinning all-rounder Mahmudullah was excellent against India, maintaining a fine start to his Test career. His form suggests he can join his skipper as a frontline player in both disciplines. At the same time, talented young wicketkeeper Mushfiqur Rahim and swashbuckling opening batsman Tamim Iqbal both made batting breakthroughs against India, striking their best Test scores.

All these players are just as dangerous in ODI cricket and England are perhaps more vulnerable in the shorter form of the game, the online sports betting odds certainly suggest this is the case. With next year’s World Cup being played in the subcontinent Strauss might have missed an opportunity to gain valuable captaining experience. Worse still, England could come unstuck on this tour.

Uncle Jrod at Cricket With Balls is after pictures for a new magazine he is launching entitled Cricket Sadists Monthly. Here is his plea.

Thanks to a hungover hour of creativity, here is The Village Cricketer’s offering:

Full length version of the Iain O’Brien interview, as featured on Test Match Sofa:

OK, so the ‘interview’ we did with Graeme Smith was spoofed. This one, however, is completely, 100% genuine.

Iain O’Brien, former New Zealand fast bowler, has retired from the international game to move to the UK, build a life with his English wife, and play for Middlesex. The Village Cricketer had the great pleasure of interviewing Iain – interrupting him cooking some wholesome vegetable soup – for the first of Test Match Sofa’s new series of podcasts, which will be available tomorrow.

Subjects covered included his reasons for leaving NZ, the rising stars of NZ cricket, how the NZ side is shaping up, prospects for Middlesex, the fear of batting against quick bowling, the fear of bowling against Sehwag, bantering with Ricky Ponting and how international sportsmen will increasingly use new media to get closer to the common man.

So, please download the Test Match Sofa podcast, which includes a five minute version of the interview and a whole host of other witty banter and cricket chat.

To listen to the full 20 minute interview, use the following link:

Over at The Guardian, Duncan Fletcher talks about the batting issues faced by Kevin Pietersen and Jonathan Trott in South Africa.

Following the exciting draw in the third test match at Cape Town, The Village Cricketer met up with Graeme Smith* to get his thoughts on the game.

TVC: Graeme, hi, what a terrific end to a test match, I’d imagine though that you are pretty deflated.

GS: Thanks and haa. Ya we did cut it close for a while there. I thought for one moment we might win it, but all in all, we are pretty satisfied with the draw.

TVC: Really?

GS: Ya, for sure. The draw is the purest form of the game. We’d rather draw than win. It puts spectators on the seats for longer. We have recognised in recent years that it is better to have an exciting draw, you have to make it interesting because spectators have alternatives such as 20/20, but I think the side is adjusting well to this new era. You know, although we are one down in the series with one to play, there have been two hugely exciting draws, and we have an opportunity to either draw the final match or to end the series with a 1-1 draw. It’s very much alive.

TVC: It’s been all over the media that you have been unhappy with some of England’s antics this series.

GS: Obviously I don’t want to say too much about that. It’s not something we’d make a formal complaint about or even be seen to be bringing it to the attention of the officials, so we just had a quiet word with the match referee and tried to leak it to the media. All I can say is that, when you have a side like ours playing flat out and striving fairly for the draw, it is not really on for England to win the second test match. Spectators lost nearly a whole day’s cricket because of it. In the past England stuck to the spirit of the draw and tried as hard for it as we do.

TVC: To change the subject completely. How is the pool of young players coming into the South African side?

GS: It’s good. We identify at a pretty early age now players that have a natural aptitude for the draw and give them specialist coaching and support. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. I mean in Jaques Kallis we have the most natural draw merchant in the game, and you don’t get those by chance. We also have players like AB, who is still young and slightly impetuous, but he is learning fast. You know though, it can also go wrong, Herschelle Gibbs came into the side and burned brightly. Too brightly really, we could never get him to bat long periods of time at less than two runs an over. We had to drop him.

TVC: England are playing several players that were born in South Africa. Would you rather they were available to play for South Africa?

GS: There are times when players, like KP, come along that are much more positive in nature. We managed to do a good job at weeding him out of the system and he moved to England. He has shown signs of maturing though, and now he gets out so that England aren’t able to chase down large totals for unlikely wins, and it means Collingwood is at the wicket sooner. It’s good for the game. I think we’d consider Jonathan Trott a loss to South African cricket. He is a fine example of a draw natural, batting steadily and taking time out of the game. Losing him was a real blow.

TVC: You seem to have some problems with your left arm spinner, he really didn’t bowl well today.

GS: Paul is in the top 10 of the world test rankings, so has proven he can bowl and play at the highest level. He has taken wickets and can spin the ball, in fact he has looked a real match winner on occasion. Luckily for us we were able to send him to Warwickshire and after a season with Ashley Giles he is now back to bowling for draws, keeping it tight and rarely threatening to take wickets.

TVC: Finally, can I ask about the quota system? Following the loss of some key players recent I’d image you are finding it pretty hard to get the balance right.

GS: You are absolutely correct. It’s tough to find a balance these days. I mean, we’ve not really fielded a ginger on a regular basis since Pollock was playing. AB and Paul Harris are close, albeit they are more dirty blonde than ginger. I think we made some terrific strides with the twelfth man in this game. He was a proper ginger, the type The Wisden Cricketer like to employ. I’m confident that given time we can uncover one and start meeting our ginger quota again. If not, we’ll recruit Paul Collingwood. He likes Cape Town and the night life here, and he loves a draw almost as much as we do.

* The role of Graeme Smith is played by an actor.

Reports are emerging from South Africa that the hosts have accused England of ball tampering. Here are a couple…

England were stunned last night after being accused of ball tampering by South Africa, who have compiled a dossier of what they believe to be suspicious actions by the touring team’s fielders during the Test series… Among their grievances yesterday were the use of boot on ball by Stuart Broad, throwing the ball on the bounce to the wicketkeeper by various fielders and the alleged lifting of the quarter-seam by James Anderson.

Geoffrey Dean, The Times

South Africa have raised their concerns with match referee Roshan Mahanama over ‘allegations about the ball’ while England were fielding on day three of the third Test. Controversy broke out at Newlands after television cameras showed England seamer Stuart Broad stopping a straight drive during the morning session with the sole of his boot.

Daily Mail

England coach Andy Flower has defended Stuart Broad after controversy with the ball on day three of the third Test. Broad was seen trapping the ball with his foot during a difficult day, which saw South Africa build a lead of 330. A South Africa spokesman said they had “raised concerns” to match referee Roshan Mahanama over the issue. But Flower said: “All that happened is the ball was rolling gently towards him and he stuck out a boot to stop the ball, I don’t think it’s a big issue.”

BBC News Online

South Africa have “raised concerns” over the state of the ball with ICC match referee Roshan Mahanama following the third day’s play against England at Cape Town. It follows TV footage that showed Stuart Broad standing on the ball as he fielded it in his followthrough.

CricInfo

Aggers says its rubbish.

Next Page »