England cricket team


Oh deary deary me. Things are looking a bit tasty in Jo’berg and the South Africans will be licking their lips in anticipation of a roasted England served up with relish.

At one point today England could possibly have been contemplating a first innings deficit of just over 100, hopes were dashed by some terrific counterpunch batting, particularly from Mark Boucher. That, and England have already lost two wickets so far in their second innings.

Its easy to blame some of the umpiring. So I will. Darryl Harper again showed he has a huge amount to learn about TV umpiring, umpiring and probably life too. Giles Clark was in extraordinary form rattling on about it on Sky during the rain break, complaining about the authority of the umpire being undermined (yes Giles, but it will be when they are making shit decisions), demanding our review back and hinting that he won’t be allowing umpire reviews this summer in England.

Unfortunately, that is just a distraction.

The real business in hand is for England to bat long and hope the rain comes.

At one point Ryan Sidebottom was England’s best bowler. That was, however, at a point when the rest of England’s bowlers were rubbish. Steve Harmison was suffering away from home. Hoggy had lost his nip. Jimmy Anderson, England’s perennial 12th man, hadn’t played regularly for about four seasons. Sidebottom swung it a bit, bowled full, and demolished probably the worst New Zealand batting line up ever away and then home.

Times have changed. Jimmy Anderson is now one of the best bowlers in the world. Stuart Broad shows signs that he could be that good too. Graham Onions deservedly got an England place, has taken a few wickets – including notable scalps, and has looked more than useful. Sidebottom wasn’t getting a look in, and to be fair, no-one could really complain about that. Sidebottom swings the ball and bowls full, however, I don’t think he does it quick enough or late enough to be a match winner against the very best test sides.

So, England dropped Onions and brought Sidebottom in for this test match. I can think of no good reason for this other than England wanting variety, but I fear that they have opted for variety at the expense of the better bowler. It would have made more sense to drop Pietersen or Trott.

Prove me wrong tomorrow please Ryan, because England’s batsmen have royally buggered things up today!

Following the exciting draw in the third test match at Cape Town, The Village Cricketer met up with Graeme Smith* to get his thoughts on the game.

TVC: Graeme, hi, what a terrific end to a test match, I’d imagine though that you are pretty deflated.

GS: Thanks and haa. Ya we did cut it close for a while there. I thought for one moment we might win it, but all in all, we are pretty satisfied with the draw.

TVC: Really?

GS: Ya, for sure. The draw is the purest form of the game. We’d rather draw than win. It puts spectators on the seats for longer. We have recognised in recent years that it is better to have an exciting draw, you have to make it interesting because spectators have alternatives such as 20/20, but I think the side is adjusting well to this new era. You know, although we are one down in the series with one to play, there have been two hugely exciting draws, and we have an opportunity to either draw the final match or to end the series with a 1-1 draw. It’s very much alive.

TVC: It’s been all over the media that you have been unhappy with some of England’s antics this series.

GS: Obviously I don’t want to say too much about that. It’s not something we’d make a formal complaint about or even be seen to be bringing it to the attention of the officials, so we just had a quiet word with the match referee and tried to leak it to the media. All I can say is that, when you have a side like ours playing flat out and striving fairly for the draw, it is not really on for England to win the second test match. Spectators lost nearly a whole day’s cricket because of it. In the past England stuck to the spirit of the draw and tried as hard for it as we do.

TVC: To change the subject completely. How is the pool of young players coming into the South African side?

GS: It’s good. We identify at a pretty early age now players that have a natural aptitude for the draw and give them specialist coaching and support. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. I mean in Jaques Kallis we have the most natural draw merchant in the game, and you don’t get those by chance. We also have players like AB, who is still young and slightly impetuous, but he is learning fast. You know though, it can also go wrong, Herschelle Gibbs came into the side and burned brightly. Too brightly really, we could never get him to bat long periods of time at less than two runs an over. We had to drop him.

TVC: England are playing several players that were born in South Africa. Would you rather they were available to play for South Africa?

GS: There are times when players, like KP, come along that are much more positive in nature. We managed to do a good job at weeding him out of the system and he moved to England. He has shown signs of maturing though, and now he gets out so that England aren’t able to chase down large totals for unlikely wins, and it means Collingwood is at the wicket sooner. It’s good for the game. I think we’d consider Jonathan Trott a loss to South African cricket. He is a fine example of a draw natural, batting steadily and taking time out of the game. Losing him was a real blow.

TVC: You seem to have some problems with your left arm spinner, he really didn’t bowl well today.

GS: Paul is in the top 10 of the world test rankings, so has proven he can bowl and play at the highest level. He has taken wickets and can spin the ball, in fact he has looked a real match winner on occasion. Luckily for us we were able to send him to Warwickshire and after a season with Ashley Giles he is now back to bowling for draws, keeping it tight and rarely threatening to take wickets.

TVC: Finally, can I ask about the quota system? Following the loss of some key players recent I’d image you are finding it pretty hard to get the balance right.

GS: You are absolutely correct. It’s tough to find a balance these days. I mean, we’ve not really fielded a ginger on a regular basis since Pollock was playing. AB and Paul Harris are close, albeit they are more dirty blonde than ginger. I think we made some terrific strides with the twelfth man in this game. He was a proper ginger, the type The Wisden Cricketer like to employ. I’m confident that given time we can uncover one and start meeting our ginger quota again. If not, we’ll recruit Paul Collingwood. He likes Cape Town and the night life here, and he loves a draw almost as much as we do.

* The role of Graeme Smith is played by an actor.

A game was was meanering to a draw at tea time game to life in the evening session. Looking comfortable England crumbled, and when Bell went with overs to go, the South African’s were favourites.

But once again Graham Onions survived the closing moments and punched the air in celebration when Morkel’s last delivery fizzed harmlessly past the off stump.

Paul Collingwood was again terrific, while Ian Bell scrapped, scraped and blunted the bowling to help bat England to safety.

I can now breath again.

Andrew Strauss has just called Onions “a legend”. Seconded and approved sir!

Reports are emerging from South Africa that the hosts have accused England of ball tampering. Here are a couple…

England were stunned last night after being accused of ball tampering by South Africa, who have compiled a dossier of what they believe to be suspicious actions by the touring team’s fielders during the Test series… Among their grievances yesterday were the use of boot on ball by Stuart Broad, throwing the ball on the bounce to the wicketkeeper by various fielders and the alleged lifting of the quarter-seam by James Anderson.

Geoffrey Dean, The Times

South Africa have raised their concerns with match referee Roshan Mahanama over ‘allegations about the ball’ while England were fielding on day three of the third Test. Controversy broke out at Newlands after television cameras showed England seamer Stuart Broad stopping a straight drive during the morning session with the sole of his boot.

Daily Mail

England coach Andy Flower has defended Stuart Broad after controversy with the ball on day three of the third Test. Broad was seen trapping the ball with his foot during a difficult day, which saw South Africa build a lead of 330. A South Africa spokesman said they had “raised concerns” to match referee Roshan Mahanama over the issue. But Flower said: “All that happened is the ball was rolling gently towards him and he stuck out a boot to stop the ball, I don’t think it’s a big issue.”

BBC News Online

South Africa have “raised concerns” over the state of the ball with ICC match referee Roshan Mahanama following the third day’s play against England at Cape Town. It follows TV footage that showed Stuart Broad standing on the ball as he fielded it in his followthrough.

CricInfo

Aggers says its rubbish.

Graeme Smith. What can you say? South Africa needed someone to step up and he murdered England’s bowlers today. 162 not out, with most of them coming in the evening session. You can only take your hat off to the man.

It’ll be interesting to see the Saffa’s tactics tomorrow. They are already 330 ahead and I’m guessing that they’ll probably look to bat till mid-afternoon tomorrow. Then, with a lead of 500 plus they’ll have the best part of four-and-a-half sessions to try and bowl England out.

Some big runs please KP.

Boycott will be loving the current test match. Grafting for runs is what he likes. That’s good cricket that is.

Rather than writing about first innings parity, my attention has been drawn though by rumours that England will rest a number of players for the tour of Bangladesh. When Geoff Miller was interviewed by Mike Atherton on Sky yesterday he did everything he could to avoid comitting to anything, but pretty much gave the game away that Strauss will be rested and Cook with captain England.

So, today The Village Cricketer predicts the England side for the first test against Bangladesh:

Alistair Cook *
Joe Denly
Jonathan Trott
Kevin Pietersen
Ian Bell
Michael Carberry
Stephen Davies +
Stuart Broad
Graeme Swann
Ryan Sidebottom
Graham Onions

Feel free to discuss.

The girlfriend dragged me to the cinema this afternoon, we went to watch Nine, it was shit. Plus I missed Swann and Broad ripping open the chest and eating the still beating heart of South Africa. The Saffas lost six wickets for 23 runs in 71 balls. You’ll have to read about it on Cricinfo.

Until I turn the TV on. Then he and Broad seemed intent on blocking till lunch. Looking forward to some fireworks in the next session.

I love cricket. You can be one of the least naturally talented batsman in the side, look dreadful for two sessions, yet get by on determination and will. Strauss was wonderful for 50, Trott played lovely shots for 18, Pietersen “dumbslog millionaire” (see When Freddie Became Jesus) was great for 30, yet Cook made the hundred and looks to be batting England into a good position. Cricket, like life, takes all sorts, and I’m really pleased for Cook that he has made some runs.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.